PlanetScale vs Supabase: Database Platform Comparison
PlanetScale and Supabase are both modern database platforms, but they're solving different problems. PlanetScale is MySQL infrastructure with developer-friendly features. Supabase is a complete backend platform built on PostgreSQL. The choice depends on whether you need a database or a backend.
What Each Platform Offers
PlanetScale gives you:
- MySQL-compatible database (built on Vitess)
- Database branching (like git for schemas)
- Non-blocking schema changes
- Connection pooling built-in
- Serverless scaling
Supabase gives you:
- PostgreSQL database
- Authentication (email, OAuth, magic links)
- File storage
- Edge Functions
- Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs
- Real-time subscriptions
- Row-level security
The feature lists tell the story: PlanetScale is a database; Supabase is a backend.
The Database Underneath
PlanetScale: MySQL via Vitess
PlanetScale runs Vitess, the MySQL scaling system created at YouTube. It's MySQL-compatible but with some differences:
Limitations:
- No foreign key constraints (by design. They complicate sharding)
- Some MySQL features unavailable (triggers have limitations)
- Vitess-specific behaviors in edge cases
The lack of foreign keys is intentional. PlanetScale's philosophy is that application code should enforce relationships, not the database. This enables horizontal scaling but requires discipline.
Supabase: PostgreSQL
Supabase runs standard PostgreSQL:
You get the full PostgreSQL feature set: foreign keys, CTEs, window functions, JSON operations, full-text search, and extensions.
Database Branching
PlanetScale's standout feature is database branching:
Schema changes deploy without locking tables. You can test migrations against production-like data. It's genuinely excellent for schema management.
Supabase doesn't have branching. Schema changes are direct:
For schema management, you'd use external tools (Prisma, TypeORM migrations, or manual scripts).
Authentication
Supabase has built-in auth:
Auth integrates with row-level security:
PlanetScale has no auth. You'd use a separate service (Auth0, Clerk, NextAuth) and implement authorization in your application.
APIs
Supabase auto-generates APIs from your schema:
No backend code needed for basic CRUD.
PlanetScale is just a database. You write your own API:
More control, more code.
Pricing (as of 2026)
Note: PlanetScale removed their free tier in March 2024.
PlanetScale:
- Scaler: $39/month (10 GB storage, 100M row reads)
- No free tier
- Pay for reads, writes, storage
Supabase:
- Free: 500 MB database, 1 GB storage, 50K auth users
- Pro: $25/month (8 GB database, 100 GB storage)
- Predictable pricing based on resources
Supabase's free tier is generous for side projects. PlanetScale requires payment from day one.
When to Choose PlanetScale
You need MySQL specifically:
- Existing MySQL application
- MySQL expertise on team
- MySQL-specific features you depend on
Schema management is critical:
- Frequent schema changes
- Need non-blocking migrations
- Want branch-based workflow for database
You have your own backend:
- Already using Auth0/Clerk for auth
- Building custom API layer
- Don't need auto-generated APIs
Horizontal scaling is a requirement:
- Preparing for massive scale
- Need Vitess's sharding capabilities
When to Choose Supabase
You need a complete backend:
- Auth + database + storage in one platform
- Want to avoid stitching services together
- Rapid prototyping priority
PostgreSQL is preferred:
- Need foreign keys enforced by database
- Want full PostgreSQL features
- Coming from PostgreSQL background
Starting with limited budget:
- Free tier for development/side projects
- Don't want to pay until launch
Real-time features needed:
- Subscriptions to database changes
- Collaborative features
- Live dashboards
Migration Considerations
From PlanetScale to Supabase
This means MySQL to PostgreSQL migration:
Significant work due to database differences.
From Supabase to PlanetScale
PostgreSQL to MySQL:
Also significant work, plus you lose foreign key enforcement.
The Honest Take
PlanetScale is excellent if you need MySQL with modern developer experience. The branching feature is genuinely useful for teams with frequent schema changes. But losing the free tier hurt, and you're paying for just a database. You'll need other services for auth, storage, etc.
Supabase is excellent if you want a complete backend quickly. The combination of PostgreSQL + auth + storage + APIs is compelling. But you don't get database branching, and you're more locked into the Supabase way of doing things.
For new projects with no MySQL requirement, Supabase is often the better choice. You get more for less, and PostgreSQL is arguably the better database. For existing MySQL applications or teams needing PlanetScale's branching workflow, it remains a solid option despite the pricing changes.
Keep Reading
Best Supabase Alternatives in 2026
Looking for alternatives to Supabase? Here are the best options depending on what you need.
Best PlanetScale Alternatives After Hobby Tier Removal
PlanetScale removed their free tier. Here are the best alternatives for developers and small projects.
Neon vs Supabase: Comparing Serverless Postgres
Two modern Postgres platforms with different philosophies. Here's how to choose.